The Electoral Evolution In The Island Of Mauritius Politics Essay

The electoral Evolution In The Island Of Mauritius Politics EssayThis prior chapter projects a clear idea ab confide the central issue of commercial enterprise in the query. The reasons for this particular investigation be as well elabo measured. A altogether-inclusive logical argu custodyt of the inquiry aims and objectives, ensn argon on the stated research b dissimilar is included. The chapter ends with a brief of the structure and content of the remain chapters of the thesis.1.0 OverviewSection 1 of the funda workforcetal legal philosophy of the Re populace of Mauritius states that Mauritius shall be a soereign popular give in which shall be known as the Republic of Mauritius. Section 2 defines that the Constitution is the supreme law of Mauritius and if any former(a) law is inconsistent with this Constitution, that other law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void.Mauritius is a constitutional parliamentary democracy, ground on the Westminster mod el, which consists of the President and the guinea pig Assembly. Elected on a First-Pass-the-post transcription, at an interval of 5 years, during the world-wide Election, the Assembly makes provision for 70 smokedidates on 20 constituencies. (The Constitution of the Republic of Mauritius)How ever, this model has been lots subject to critics. Michael Duggett (2009), in his thesis ab off the Westminster Model, states that this model is one-dimensional, simplistic and has weakened as well as privatised. Rod Rhodes (2005) express his opinion saying that the model is hollowed- turn up. This capability be a cause which is actuateing the level of chooser outturn in Mauritius.1.1 Scope of the translateIn this orbit, I propose to admit the different causes of abstinence at the General Elections and the policies that can be select to disgrace this phenomenon. This research relates to the island of Mauritius only and in that locationfore does non include Rodrigues and the o ther outer islands. query TitleThe research title isA study of the causes of pick out abstinence at the General Election in the Island of Mauritius. description of voteing abstention abstinence occurs when an desirable elector does not weave a ballot during an pick process. It has been notice that many countries be worthless from a high abstention direct ascribable to the citizens low connection during elections.1.3 Problem statementAnelectionis a formaldecision-making processby which a race chooses an individual to hold public force epoch vote is a citizens polite duty however there ar well-nigh citizenry who abstain from right to vote for several reasons. Since our representative democratic model relies on citizen lodge in elections, less participation elbow room less representation, therefore, less people who nail down for all(prenominal)one else. Falling swindle is a great deal proposen as a mark of pullout, if not of actual disaffection (Norris 1999)The General Elections of year 2005 and 2010 pull up stakes be used to show the issue that is, a rise in pick out abstention. Table 1 below shows the count of abstention at the General Election during the year 2005 and 2010. A comminuted epitome of the statistics is given in Appendix A The rate of voting abstention in year 2005 and Appendix B The rate of voting abstention in year 2010.Table 1 Rate of abstention during year 2005 2010 General ElectionYearNo of Registered electorsNo of voters% of votersAbstention Rate200579344964406981.1718.83201087535665844175.2224.78Average Rate78.0521.95Source electoral Commissioners Office1.4 Research AimThe main aim of the study is to analyse the causes which are change order the rate of production in the Mauritian General Election.1.5 Research ObjectivesThe objectives of this research are as take insTo calculate the level of abstention and the evolution therefore during the General Election of year 2005 and 2010To identify the fac tor outs which are likely to affect the decision of Mauritians whether to abstain or to voteTo find out the policies that can be adopted to alleviate this problem of voter abstention.1.6 Structure of the dissertationCHAPTER 1 introduces the issue of voting abstention, the actual electoral system in Mauritius, the right to vote downstairs the Mauritian Constitution, the scope of the study, the research title, the statement of problem is identified, the research aim and the research objectives are pointed out and conk out the structure of the dissertation is elaborated in details.CHAPTER 2 focuses on the semipolitical system and its evolution since 1810 before adopting the actual system.CHAPTER 3 provides a lit review which analyses the different causes that could affect voters from abstaining.CHAPTER 4 encompasses in detail how the research has been carried out and comprises all relevant information regarding the research methods to meet the objectives of the study.CHAPTER 5 prov ides a discussion of results and findings from the survey which has been carried out. Each aspect of the questionnaire had been analyzed and interpreted.CHAPER 6 provides a conclusion and some recommendations for the do good of insurance makers and administrators and other people engagemented in this field, together with a conclusion.1.7 Chapter ConclusionThis starting line chapter has helped to facility out an everywhereview about the topic under investigation. The scope of the study is worked out before giving way to the research aims and objectives. Finally the structuring of the upstanding make known has been elaborated.CHAPTER 2THE ELECTORAL EVOLUTION IN THE ISLAND OF MAURITIUS2.0 A Historical circumstanceThe Island of Mauritius has been consequently conquered by Arab Sailors, Portuguese, Dutch, cut and the British. The Arab sailors were the prototypal who vi internet sited the island which was named as Dina Arobi. The Portuguese came in year 1507, followed by the Du tch during the year 1598 who renamed the island as Mauritius. In 1715, the french took control of the island and renamed it Ile de France. Ile de France was formally surrendered to the British, on the 3rd December 1810, where the islands name was reverted to Mauritius. During their abdication, the French was allowed to keep their land and attri stille and to use the French language and law of France in civil and criminal matters on the island. (Prisheela Motee, The program library Congress, South Travels, Oracle, encyclopedia 2007, electoral form for sustainable Democracy in Africa)2.1 Electoral strategyMauritius has experienced a figure of speech of electoral systems since 1810 before adopting the actual system. The electoral system of Mauritius is based on the majority rule and authorities perceptual constancy as it comprises of a fair representation of the race. The choice of government is do by citizens. (Prisheela Motee, The library Congress, South Travels, Oracle, encyclopedia 2007, Electoral Institute for sustainable Democracy in Africa)2.1.1 One Man One Rule (1810-1886)During 1810-1886, Mauritius was under the British Colonial Rule whereby the governor was enjoying all the law-making and decision-making process over Franco-Mauritian elite. It was a one man one rule policy.In 1825, Mauritius obtained its premier(prenominal) Constitution under which a Council of Government, which consisted of 4 top officials gaffer Justice, Chief Secretary, Commander of forces and Collector of Customs, was set up.Later, in 1885, the Constitution was revised and enlarge to make room for elective representatives. The new Council of Government provided 27 members, including 10 elected members, on a restricted franchise. (Prisheela Motee, The library Congress, South Travels, Oracle, Encyclopaedia 2007, Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa)2.1.2 First-Pass-The-Post-System (FPTP) (1886-1958)Year 1886, welcomes Mauritius first General Election (G.E) under the British Rule. The G.E was limited to wealthy property owners, who constituted only 2 percent of the adult population that is, out of 365,000 inhabitants, only 12,000 of which all were men, could vote.2 out of 10 elected members were from Port-Louis and 1 from each 8 zones. Under the 1885 Constitution, Mauritius was divided into 9 constituencies and each constituency elected one representative and Port-Louis, the capital, in relation to highest come in of population returned ii views to the legislative.The elections were held during nine days from 11-20 January and were based on the first-past-the-post system. Traces of the 1886 Constitution, can be base in the actual electoral system as the FPTP has been prevailing in Mauritius whereby the candidate receiving the highest number of votes were elected.Due to World War II, G.E could not be held during 1939-1945. The second G.E was then held in 1948, after that the 1886 Constitution was re spatial relationd by a ne w one, which allowed all those above 21 years old who could sign up their name in any of the following languages English, French, Creole, or any Indian languages, to vote through FPTP. Out of 419,000 72,000 inhabitants, including 12,000 women, were registered electors.Following constitutional conventions held in capital of the United Kingdom in 1955 and 1957, the ministerial system was initiated and G.E was held on 9th touch 1959. Voting took place for the first time on the basis of universal adult right to vote and the number of electors rose to 208,684. (Prisheela Motee, The library Congress, South Travels, Oracle, Encyclopaedia 2007, Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa)2.1.3 London symmetricalness (1956-1957)Due to Mauritius social society the issue of an ideal electoral system has been a current headache. Since 1956, there was a need for a proper representation of the citizens in the fantan. In the first London Agreement in 1957, the concept of propor tionate Representation (PR) in the system was bluntly rejected. The agreement was supposed to supplant communal ideology and encourage a system based on political parties not religion. The citizens wanted an ethnic reassurance where PR could prevailed in the National Assembly.The Mauritius Labour Party (MLP) under the successive persisterships of Dr Maurice Cure and Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam persistently struggled not only for universal vote and responsible Government, but also a ministerial form of Government, a decrease in the number of nominees and an ontogenesis in that of elected members, changes in the composition of the Executive Council, the appointment of a Speaker and the majority society leader to be styled Prime Minister. During the 1955 thoroughgoing Conference which was held in London, the MLP requested some constitutional changes. The London Agreement envisaged nomination of maximum of 12 nominees to ensure fair representation. The right to vote was franchise to both sexes over the age of twenty-one and symbols were introduced to facilitate uneducated voters. The number of electors rose to 207,000 at the 1957 elections. (Prisheela Motee, The library Congress, South Travels, Oracle, Encyclopaedia 2007, Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa)2.1.4 Trustram- eve Recommendations (1957)In year 1957, Sir Malcolm Trustram Eve member of the London Agreement, recommended a 40 atomic number 53-member constituency system along with the FPTP system. This implies that there is no need for a majority overall to win over a seat.The year 1957 had launched the Ministerial system where the elected candidates were able to decide upon policy issues in many areas. The Ministerial system comprised of nine ministers out of whom six were elected and troika nominated. Despite the fact that it was not a fully elected body, the island had its first representative body and the Executive Council was chaired by the Governor.Trustrams recommendation was to ensure ethnic and communal representation in the legislative. The nominees are the ancestors of the surmount loser system. In 1964, in view of not touch the population, the governors did not increase the number of nominees. (Prisheela Motee, The library Congress, South Travels, Oracle, Encyclopaedia 2007, Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa)2.1.5 Banwell Report (1966)The Banwell Report was ab initio based on the Trustrams-Eve recommendations. Part of Mauritius actual electoral system is based on Banwell Recommendations. Banwell Commission was set up after the plans made for an electoral system, at the Lancaster House Conference of September 1965, failed.Banwell then proposed the followings20 constituencies move 3 members in Mauritius and 2 members in Rodrigues.A division of the population for electoral law purposes Hindu, Muslin, Chinese and the General Population.Use of FPTP in scheme and the three pass the post in utilisation.5 constant best loser sit to be filled as soon as results of popular election are official so as to track the problem of under representation.Candidates chosen as best losers should secure largest number of votes among the defeated candidates belonging to the under-represented community and 10% of the general votes.Any companionship receiving much than 25% of the total vote and less than 25% seats in Parliament would be reallocated to bring its share to 25%.The last proposal was rejected by the MLP, then Stonehouse MLPs friend, was called as a negotiator. (Prisheela Motee, The library Congress, South Travels, Oracle, Encyclopaedia 2007, Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa)2.1.5.1 Stonehouse ModificationsStonehouse modified the 5 constant correctives to the 8 best loser votes. The versatile correctives and the 10% votes were also rejected. The first 4 best losers seats were to be allocated to parties belonging to under presented communities irrespective to party affiliation .The community for the first 4 best losers is obtained by dividing the population of each of the communities by number of seats obtained by that community in general election accession one. The second 4 best losers were allocated on party and community basis. (Prisheela Motee, The library Congress, South Travels, Oracle, Encyclopaedia 2007, Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa)2.1.5.2 The final proposal and actual electoral systemThe final proposal and the actual electoral system is based on Banwell recommendations and modified by Stonehouse.There are 70 members in the parliament ,60 out of the 70 are directly elected through FPTP in 20 constituencies with go 3 candidates each and Rodrigues 2 candidates as shown in the table below. The remaining 8 are the best losers chosen by the Electoral supervisory Commission immediately after results of general elections. This structure has been basically maintained up to now. (Prisheela Motee, The library Congress, South Trav els, Oracle, Encyclopaedia 2007, Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa)2.1.6 IndependenceThe 1967 election brought a milestone in the history of Mauritius. About 90% of the electorate voted. PMSD fought against freedom while MLP fought for independence. PMSD was defeated and MLP win 39 seats by obtaining 54% of the national votes. Mauritius acceded to the status of independence on the 12th March 1968.The first parliamentary election which took place on the 20th December 1976 amended the right to vote. Those aged 18 and above could vote. Out of 462,034, 170,000 were new eligible voters. The first general election after independence was an electoral victory. It was the first time that a single party alliance Mauritian Militant Movement (MMM) and Parti Socialiste Mauricien (PSM), won all 60 seats. Subsequently, the contribution was altered to guarantee that legislation elections occur every five years. Parliamentary by-elections were also reinstated. (Prisheela Mote e, The library Congress, South Travels, Oracle, Encyclopaedia 2007, Electoral institute for sustainable democracy in Africa)2.1.7 Westminster ModelThe Constitution of Mauritius provides for the Parliament of Mauritius to consist of the President and the National Assembly. The Parliament of Mauritius is modeled after the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, where Members of Parliament are voted in at regular general elections, on the basis of a first past the post system. (Official site of the Republic of Mauritius-The Parliament)The Westminster System guarantees the separation of the legislative, executive and judicial positions. Political power rests on the Prime Minister and the cabinet. Sixty-two members of Parliament are elected every five years by universal adult suffrage and all major political parties are represented in Parliament.The legislative Assembly became the National Assembly. The Governor General was replaced by the President of the Republic. The last men tioned is elected by the legislative upon the recommendation of the Prime Minister. (Dukhira, 2002)CHAPTER 3 reassessment OF LITERATURE3.0 IntroductionA vote is an electorates act of voting, whereby voting is the polite duty of every citizen. It is the starting and the ending point of every democracy. In general, the voting system allows electors to select a candidate or a party.The citizens participation in election is important for democracy. If citizens do not buzz off a hand in political things (especially elections) democracy is exposed to weaken risks. (Pasquino, 1983).Citizens derive a direct benefit from fulfilling this duty. However, it is indeed serious because some citizen abstains from their civic duty. The decrease in the rate of voter trucking rig has been eer observed. It is con listed that voter railroad siding and voter abstention are closely tie in to one-another. These two factors will be used interchangeably throughout this study but as opposites of each o ther.Poole and Rosenthal (1997) argue that the decision to vote or to abstain can be develop with the equationR=P (B)-C+Dwhere R is the net reward from voting, B is the material benefit brought about by voting, P is the probability that ones vote makes a difference, C is the cost associated with voting, and D is the fixed benefit of voting.Electors will abstain if the perceived benefits of abstention will exceed the perceived costs. This can be formulated by an equation R= (P (B))-(C+D))0.On the other hand, Corey Brettschneider (2007) claimed that mutual respect, comparability or autonomy, are the core substantive value associated to the right to vote. These values should make the right to vote worth being enjoyable and exercisable, earlier than the other way round. Riker and Ordeshook (1968) introduced the citizen duty notion to explain the issue of voter kit.This literature review addresses the causes, factors leading to a decrease of voter end product and an increase in voti ng abstention.3.1 voter AbstentionAbstention occurs when an eligible voter does not cast a ballot during an election process. It has been observed that many countries are suffering from a high abstention rate due(p) to the citizens low participation during elections.Abstention is a real concern and a challenge for politicians, who must persuade the public of the need to vote, harmonize to Seddik Chihas of the National Democratic Rally (RND). (Ademe Amine, 2012).Abstention shall not be compared with blank shell vote where an eligible voter purposely spoils a vote by marking it wrongly or by marking anything at all, whereby abstention is when the electorate does not vote at all.3.1.1 Un- inform electors agree to Arianna Degans and Antonio Merlos study in 2004, who votes and for who people vote admonishmine the outcome of the elections. It is of high importance for candidates during elections to ensure the participation of their citizens and as well as their voting decisions.Abstent ion occurs when there is a lack of information about the candidates, (Arianna Degan and Antonio Merlo, 2004), who make the wrong decision or the wrong choice. This can be costly to the elections where a wrong candidate might be elected. Some electors might also feel causeless to vote due to a feeling of uncertainty towards candidates but when a citizen is well informed about his civic duty and the electoral candidates, he will definitely recruit during elections and vote for the right candidate.3.2 Voter end productVoter turnout is the percentage of eligible voters who cast a ballot in an election. Eligible voters shall not be compared with the total adult population because some adults are not eligible to vote. Voter turnout is an indispensable quality of fair election and is considered to be a necessary factor for a healthy democracy. Low turnout is generally accredited to disengagement from the system because of perceived efficacy of voting in altering policy decisions. Conse quently established democracies with free elections usually shed higher turnout than other states.Understanding voter turnoutVoting turnout has often been used to judge the evolution of democratic countries, (Scot and Barbara, 2005). The act of voting depicts the preference of the citizens as this show the extent to which the citizens are actually engageed in being represented.(Fair Vote Canada Lijphart, 1996)However, low level of participation is being spy on behalf of eligible voters. This is due to disenchantment, indifference, or contentment. As such a poll with low turnout is not reliable, because it does not show what the whole country wants it shows only part of the citizens will. For example, an elector may have abstained from voting because her favourite party had no chances of attaining representation.Different countries have very different average voter turnouts. Low turnout can be expressed differently. For example, in real countries, the young and the poor are the abstainers. However, India which comprises of an electorate of to a greater extent(prenominal) than 670 million people, the contrary is tack together. The poor, who comprises of the majority of the demographic, tend to vote more than the rich and the middle- class, and turnout is higher in rural areas than in urban areas ( D.Gupta, 2004)3.2.2 Socio- economic factorsCitizens participate politically when their level of wealth and education increases because they are more informed and has a feeling of efficacy. This leads to a higher political participation (Lijphart, 1997). fit to Ioannis and Phil (2005), sociologist argues that the political demeanor, the identification with a partys values and peoples interest to vote are affected by the socio.economic characteristics. Turnout is higher among those with higher income, those of higher education, vacuous -collar workers, whites, men, middle-aged , older voters, those with closer community ties, those married and the members of or ganizations.In development countries, to maintain security and economic development in case when things are bad, citizens tend to vote in great numbers (Radcliff 1992 Fornos et al.2004)Cultural ingredientThe educational level and the wealth of the country affect turnout but these are not reliable measures as in countries like Europe, in spite of the fact that it is wealthy and have a high rate of literacy, the level of turnout is found to be low.Despite the fact, that countries, like those in Europe and Latin America have a newer democracy, they do not have the cultural habit of voting. The eligible voters do not have the sense of civic duty, which takes time and certain social conditions to develop. These social conditions developed by G. Bingham Powell aretrust in government,the degree of partisanship among the population,interest in politics, andbelief in the efficiency of voting.Political FactorCrewe et al. (1992) traced tetrad factors associated with turnout irregularitybein g young,having recently moved home,the type of trapping tenure, and,marital status(single or divorced).These factors are inter-correlated but they have an independent install on turnout. According to Crewe et al. (1992), isolation from personal and national networks resulted in a lack of political information or pressure to vote, thus, cast downing turnout due to a lack of motivation.Weak or absent party emerged as another important source of irregular voting (Crewe et al, 1992). According to their study, the identification of age and strength are inter-dependently related to voter turnout.A lack in the government performance also carries a damaging impact upon turnout. Strong political competition and ideological cleavages between parties tend to increase turnout (Dalton, 1988).Institutional FactorInstitutional factors have a significant impact on voter turnout. These variables are classified into three categoriesElectoral rules,Perception of the effectiveness of political sci ence institutions,Mobilization.Electoral rulesVariables in electoral rules include needful voting, fitting rules and voting age. needful votingCompulsory voting increases turnout because once voting is made mandatory, people follow the rule irrespective of the punitive sanctions for non-voting (Lijphart 1997). However, in Venezuela and the Netherlands compulsory voting has been rescinded, due to a decrease in turnout. On the other hand, Paraguay having a compulsory voting system imposes payment of a fine and ineligibility for elective office for a prescribed period. Colombia and Nicaragua also have compulsory voting. In Greece voting is compulsory however there are practically no sanctions for those who do not vote. In Belgium voting is compulsory, too, but not strongly enforced. adaptation rulesAutomatic and compulsory registration often leads to a low turnout because even those who are not eligible, as stated below in the case study The Republic of Mauritius Disqualified voters, are on the registration list which gives false survey.Conversely, an election where registration is voluntary or requires a personal initiative ought to be associated with higher voter turnout, because the institutional prohibition of registration has already been surmounted. (Payne et al, 2002)Voting ageVoting age has been found to be positively associated to voting turnout as younger citizens are less exposed to politics (Wolfinger and Rosenstone, 1980) and are less likely to vote as older voters. Compared to the youths, the older generations tend to have the sense of civic duty. Older people vote more than youths. The act of voting is also seen as part of the young people coming-of-age ritual.3.2.5.2 Perception of the effectiveness of governing institutionsVariables in the governing effectiveness category include the number of political parties, the relative power of the lower house, federalism or the centralization of the government, and concurrent elections. These variables m ay affect voters perceptions of the effectiveness or the policy of the powers of the elected officials.The number of political partiesJackman (1987) argues that multi parties lead to coalition building to policy ambiguity and compromise. It is expected to crop the probability of legislative majorities and worsen executive legislative cooperation which may lead to rendering the electoral process less consequential.The relative power of the lower houseThis unicameral legislature has to adopt the majoritarian policy to be more effective. This is supposed to render voting to be more meaningful.The centralization of the governmentCentralized government is more effective, efficient and decisive. Jones (1997) argues that federal political arrangements bring out new electoral dynamics. The federalism variable is ought to capture longer ballots, which are believed to reduce turnout and the presence of unique local election laws that may deter voting.Concurrent electionsConcurrent election means the instances when presidential and legislative elections are held at the same time. Concurrent election is supposed to increase voter turnout as it is expected to contribute to the perception that the election is more relevant.3.2.5.3 MobilizationInstitutional variables in the mobilization category include district magnitude and electoral disproportionality.District magnitudeAs district magnitude increases political parties have more incentives to retain all seats found in a particular district (Powell, 1986). With a smaller crime syndicate of candidates or political parties competing for votes in the district, the distribution of patronage will be more visible and more certain which is ought to result in greater voter mobilization.Electoral disproportionalityElectoral disproportionality occurs when parties receive electoral support that does not translate into representation in the legislature in which case, votes have been squander (Burnham 1987). Wasted votes are found t o be associated negatively with voting turnout as parties have less of an incentive to turn out to vote.3.2.5.4 salienceMark. N. Franklin (1997) argues that salience is the effect of a vote of an eligible voter over a country. Salient issues are politically important as public opinions are likely to structure party support and voting behaviour and form the subject of political debate. Voters perceptions of fairness impact on salience. Citizens will not cast any ballot if they feel that the election is not worthy, corrupted and determined by fraud thus relating to low voter turnout.Gender AbstentionFor ages, gender inequality has been prevailing. Women were considered to be inferior to men. Women were enwrapped in a more private sphere leaving men in a public one, especially in politics due to a combination of psychological and sociological causes. If we refer to classical literature, we shall see how women were kept away from the social aspect of life. Women roles in the society w ere to be a mother, a wife, a sister or a friend. This practice has prevailed for years. There is only a minority of women who participates in the society.However an analysis at the end of 90s in 19 centuries (Norris et al, 2003) confirmed that Norway had a distaff participation rate significantly higher than men, in Germany, Great Britain and Spain men and women abstention rates were very close, and in all countries there was an trespass in the youngest ages, female children vote more than their mothers.Voter FatigueVoter fatigue tends to lower turnout. This occurs when participants do not find any interest to cast a ballot. They get bored and reject participation. This may be due to frequent election. Eileen Park, a journalist, reported on 31 March 2012 that voter fatigue might be a cause to puzzle out the public not to vote though being at the eve of the GOP (Grand Old Party) Presidential Election in Wisconsin. The public were no more motivated to vote.Voter SuppressionVoter s uppression is used as a stratagem to influence the outcome of an election by