Thoreau's views of Nature is primarily subjective in which he Essay

Thoreaus views of Nature is primarily subjective in which he set himself as a part of Nature whereas those of Darwin and - Essay ExampleHis political view seems to be more than closer to the concept of Individualism but at the same time, it is of dangerous effects in equipment casualty of the line he drew through the chapters like Civil Disobedience. As any another(prenominal) writer, Thoreaus writings may bear resemblance to the thoughts of different authors. To see through him from the perspective of an individualist intellect in comparison with some other individualistic ideologists is interesting. John Locke, a prominent English writer and philosopher of the 17th century who questioned the divine rights of the King, triggered a revolution of theorization in the field of political and philosophical thoughts. Locke is strictly an empiricist, who holds the view that the experience of the senses is pivotal in pursuit of knowledge. In this sense, when we turn back to Thoreau and his working experiment with the simplicity of life in Walden Pond, can we find any similarities or dissimilarities between Thoreau and Locke? Or can we say that did the views propounded by Thoreau derive from the Lockes writing? This research paper is an attempt to expect into Thoreaus thoughts on nature from this viewpoint. Does Thoreaus Views of Nature Stem from Lockes Writings? Lets start with a quote used by Thoreau in his essay titled Where I Lived and What I lived for. I am monarch of all I survey My right there is none to affray (Thoreau retrieved from http//thoreau.eserver.org/walden00.html) Thoreau asserts that man is supreme in constituting his understanding of nature as we see in the philosophy of empiricism. From these words, it is open that Thoreau believes that human beings are absolutely free to lead their life in nature as they manage and a particular government or a law cannot reign over the free willing of them. Again in the essay titled Civil Disobedience, one of the most controversial and influential essays by him which inspired the great social thinkers like Mahatma Gandhi and Tolstoy, I heartily accept the motto , that government is dress hat which governs least(Thoreau. Retrieved from http//thoreau.eserver.org/civil1.html). We can a draw a line connecting the main thought of both of the citations, which accentuates mans freedom in the give tongue to of nature. In this regard, he is obliged to Lockes views of nature as we record the essay titled Of the State of Nature TO understand political power right, and derive it from its original, we must consider,what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and lock of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man. (Locke. retrieved from http//www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtre). Here, we can see the meeting points of the ideolo gy of both the writers and it is most probable that Thoreaus views must hire shaped from Lockes thoughts. According to individualistic ideology man is supreme and above anothers restrictions. The above-mentioned wordings of the both of the writers assert the same line of thought in different manner. It is easy to conclude from this similarity in thought that Thoreau should have forged his conception of nature and human freedom from the individualistic ideologists like Locke. Through the analysis of The Second Treatise of Government by Locke it is obvious that he upholds the view that sovereignty is secured in the hands