Sunday, February 24, 2019
Explore the ways in which Frayn presents the character of Keith in Spies Essay
Frayn presents the temperament of Keith in Spies by dint of the protagonist Stephens recollection of their childhood adventures as best friends. Keith is shown as aw be and confident in his populateledge and status, with an imagination so evidently limitless to the point of violence. Despite this, Frayn evokes sympathy from the reader by portraying Keith for what he truly is a young boy who handlings the signal detection halt as a instrument of drop from what appears a normal, but tart upbringing.Frayn presents Keith in relation to Stephen, within the context of their friendship. Through their contrasting characteristics and family backgrounds their personalities argon created. Frayns use of Stephen as a subservient yet satisfied friend highlights Keiths dominance He Keith was the leader, and I was the led.. He was the ships officer corps I was the Other Ranks, and grateful to be so. Frayns use of repeated sentence structure emphasises the divide in status of the two. Th e family relationship is presented as balanced by both Stephen and Keiths contentedness of the mogul imbalance. Stephen is grateful to follow Keith, who enjoys beingness leader. Keiths dominance and power over Stephen is made evident, especially as Frayn presents Keith, in Stephens eyes, as sanely of a god One single heroic deed, to lay at Keiths feet in the morning. This image that is portrayed is that of a sacrifice, an offering to buy off for what Stephen feels are his inadequacies, and his betrayal of Keiths trust.Frayn also makes it evident that Keiths assume superiority above other children comes from his awareness of his status in society. once again Frayn uses Stephens memory as a framework to subtly swear the reader of Keiths social status. In Stephens memory they are socially colour-coded- Keiths yellow and black uniform immediately identifies him as coming from the right school. Keith does not talk to other children in the Close, whole to Stephen, whom he can ea sily manipulate. Frayn submits Keiths insensitivity as he patronises Stephen with Go home if youre bored, old bean, a term Keiths father uses on him to signal a punishment. Frayn clearly uses this phrase to demonstrate Keith echoing his fathers threattowards him, this time it is directed at Stephen. In this case, however, the punishment Keith intends for Stephen is not a caning, but the humiliation of show like a child in their pretend adult spying game.Through Keith, Frayn demonstrates the power of a childs imagination. From the outset he introduces Keith as an imaginative boy who leads fantastic expeditions like investigating murderer-neighbours. This inclination is further developed by Frayn with, My mother is a German spy. This shows Keiths awareness of his mothers unusual and deceptive behaviour, with the war as a backdrop adding realism to his game. Frayn shows Keiths imagination as an escape from his perfectly ordered bedroom- a reflection of his fathers strict control of the house.Frayn employs the use of Keiths fathers character to create fearsomeness within Keiths character himself. The reader empathises with Stephens emotional state of terror at Keith, as Frayn creates apprehension at Keiths stretch into the boys den and the iconic bayonet is taken out. In contrast with Barbara Berrills perception of it as simply and more importantly, realistically, a carving injure- in Keiths hands tension is immediately created portrayed as an echo of Mr Hayward through learned behaviour, Keith is capable of inflicting physical pain and violence, and does so. He makes a dismissive comment to Stephen, If you think that hurt, you dont know what hurting is. One the one hand this could be interpreted as Keiths typical undermining of Stephens feelings, challenging him to act like the brave, unconquerable adult Keith perceives himself to be. On the other hand, it could be read as a cry for help, suggesting that for Keith, physical pain from his father is more bea rable than being restricted of his freedom to be what he truly is a child.In Keith Frayn shows a lost childhood, exploring within it the idea of secrets of what seem normal and flawless in the surface, presenting imagination as a way to violence, and alternatively, a means of escapism from a harsh world.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.